Search:

Turkey, Israel, the US, and the Persian Predicament

[ Posted On: 2008-01-08 ]

As there are growing signs that just a few months before terminating his tenure President Bush will commit the most disastrous mistake in the History of the United States, pulled mostly by the ominous figure of his anti-American Vice-President, more people realize that any Western attack against Iran would unleash a disastrous wind of conflicts that will all be at the West's grave detriment.

As we already made clear in an earlier article (The Time for an American Attack against Iran is Over! / http://www.buzzle.com/articles/the-time-for-an-american-attack-against-iran-is-over.html), America is not anymore in a position to face the consequences of a US air attack against Iran, as they will involve political movements and military reactions from Russia, economic measures from China, severe deterioration of the US – EU relationship, and above all, a Shia thunderstorm across the Middle East that will be mainly addressed against Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emirates, Qatar, and Israel.

As an over-indebted country, America is gradually but rapidly entering into the financial crisis that will drive the US to ultimate bankruptcy. Bankrupt countries are never taken seriously, and have great difficulty in preserving their status of world power, let alone that of a superpower! It is high time for America to realize that the US can win through nuance, sophistication, and basic re-considerations.

However, this does not signify that in a year or two or three, a nuclear Iran will have to surely be a reality. We are not constrained to face this ominous development, and there are still various ways to efficiently prevent it. One should first figure out why a nuclear Iran has to be avoided.

Why a nuclear Iran should not come to exist.

The main reasons for which a nuclear Iran is not acceptable do not pertain to an impending attack against Israel, as many low level propagandists idiotically pretend in several, otherwise considered as serious and prestigious, newspapers in America and Europe. This would not come immediately, and it will not come without pretext. Certainly, Israel will feel the presence of another stronger rival in the area, and the margin of maneuver of the Jerusalem government will be somewhat limited. All this does not consist in a reason to worry.

Contrarily to the Israeli connection, a nuclear Iran is unacceptable for several other reasons of either regional or global character.

First, a nuclear Iran will be a good reason for other countries to follow in the same path. This would be catastrophic because, contrarily to the biased propaganda of Western media – mainly controlled by either the Anglo-French Apostate Freemasonic Lodge or their Zionist proxies – it is far more dangerous for the entire world that Saudi Arabia or Egypt have nuclear weapons.

As a matter of fact, part of the aforementioned propaganda is that Pakistan is not portrayed as more dangerous than Iran as nuclear power. In case, the Pakistani ochlocracy arrives to power – which has always been a possibility over the past ten years – the clash with India over Kashmir would explode up to a mini-nuclear war. This will not be the case with the nuclear Ayatollahs.

One has to get a clear picture; in Asia there are already many nuclear nations, namely Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and Israel. At this very moment, another two Asiatic countries, Japan and Turkey, take serious steps to develop the infrastructure needed so that in the span of the next 2 – 3 years they be able to possess nuclear weapons.

The nuclear proliferation is not a danger in and by itself. It could even help prevent nuclear and conventional wars. And the termination of the post-WW II period, with Germany, Italy, and Japan joining the nuclear club, is not a reason of concern due to the democratic structures that exist in these three countries. Neither will it be a problem if Mexico, Canada, Brazil, South Africa, Turkey, Poland, Thailand, Malaysia or Australia become nuclear powers over the next decades.

The problem is mainly limited in a few countries whereby the religious extremism, fanaticism, and ulcerous hatred match the locally prevailing ignorance, analphabetism, barbarism, and racism; these realms have long been allowed to survive due to long date Freemasonic plans to use them – without the local leaders being able to understand it – in a standoff that would lead to a Middle Eastern Holocaust, and to their annihilation. If one wants to avoid further wars in the region, one must ensure that Nigeria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia will never advance in this direction. Their supposedly pro-Western regimes are also part of the Freemasonic conspiracy – again, without the local besotted tyrants being able to understand it!

Second, a nuclear Iran will be a far more totalitarian country whereby the conditions of the numerous oppressed and tyrannized nations, ethnic and religious groups will worsen. Azeris, Aramaeans, Soranis, Kurds, Turks, Turkmens, Loris, Bakhtiaris, Baluchis, Ahl-e Haq, Bahais, Parsis (Zoroastrians) and others will find themselves in a far deteriorated situation, as the Ayatollah Shia theocracy will introduce further legislation to enforce the radicalization of the Shia Persian regime in an erratic eschatological and fake messianic direction.

Third, and even worse, the entire world will have almost no chance to challenge the Shia Persian tyranny, and with the Ayatollahs possessing nuclear weapons, our possibility to contribute to the liberation of the tyrannized nations of Iran will be minimal. Abandoning more than half of Iran's population to the hands of cruel and paranoid tyrants is not an option in our world of respect of, and concern for, Human Rights and Democracy. If we still have a chance to help Iran's tyrannized nations and religious groups to form independent, free, and respectable societies, the eventuality of nuclear Iran will put a tombstone on their dreams.

Fourth, a nuclear Iran will be easily manipulated by Russia and China against America and Europe, with all the catastrophic consequences that this may herald for the entire world. Both countries, pursuing different anti-Western agendas, will certainly try to exploit a nuclear Iran to create a diplomatic havoc, and constrain Europe and America to undesired agreements through Iranian nuclear blackmailing.

If not America, who?

At this point, we have to clarify that, if the time for an American attack against Iran is over, an Israeli attack against Iran's nuclear installations was never a possible eventuality. By this, we don't mean that technically it could not happen; certainly Israel has the capacity to attack and eventually destroy targets on Iranian soil.

However, we believe that the Israeli military and political leaderships are able to imagine and take into account the devastating Iranian reprisals, which would spread horror throughout the Middle East, from Iraq and Lebanon to Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the Gulf area. Iran's reactions against Israel would be worse than in the case of an American attack, and we have every reason to be certain that the paranoia of an Israeli attack against Iran is not in the mind of a single Israeli general or political leader.

In fact, an Israeli attack against Iran would trigger the eradication of the Israeli state, plunging numerous other countries of the Middle East to rebellion and chaos. Not a single pro-American establishment among the so-called Arabic speaking countries would survive.

Only a Muslim country could do it!

In fact, the problem is not the country, Iran itself, but the existing totalitarian regime; a democratic, free, and multicultural Iran could certainly possess nuclear weapons, like England, France or Israel. As the epicenter of the Iranian dictatorship evolves around Shia Islam, it is clear that only a Muslim country can solve the problem, thus offering great service to Israel, America, the West, and the entire world.

Who cannot do it!

The Muslim country that could put an end to the Ayatollah regime cannot not be

1. Iraq, occupied by the US forces and plunged in chaos,

2. Afghanistan, submerged in rebellion against the Western military troops and the otherwise impotent President Karzai, or

3. Pakistan, multi-divided and deeply traumatized.

4. It cannot be Azerbaijan, preoccupied with Armenia, or tiny Turkmenistan.

To adequately deal with the Iranian regime, a Muslim country must have the military strength, the political will, common borders, and – above all – a Vision for Freedom for the peoples of the Middle East and Central Asia.

In brief, what a foreign invasion of Iran must avoid is the long list of grave mistakes committed by the Americans in Iraq. The US administration believed that, through contacts with the 2 – 3 largest groups of Iraq, everything could be sold and solved. This proved to be very wrong.

The Americans did not realize that – according to their own words – they were not in Iraq for their interests, but in order to

1. liberate the various local nations,

2. enforce respect for Human Rights and Democracy,

3. impose Justice, and

4. rectify the perverse work carried out by the colonial regimes.

Perhaps this is not easily understood, but the removal of Saddam Hussein is by definition the termination of a colonial regime that took various forms ever since the British invaded – illegally – Mesopotamia, and imposed – illegally – their colonial falsehood.

If the American leadership failed to perceive their attack against Saddam Hussein as deeply anti-colonial of nature, this alone explains the reasons of their failure.

What the real target should be.

To adequately deal with the Iranian regime, a Muslim country must beforehand understand that this undertaking has nothing to do with an invasion of Iran, but with the liberation of the various nations that have long been terrorized by the ominous Ayatollahs regime.

Every action should be undertaken with them, for them, and to their utmost benefit; the oppressed Azeris, Turks, Turkmens, Soranis, Kurds, Ahl-e Haq, Bahais, Aramaeans, Loris, Bakhtiaris, Parsis and Baluchis must be contacted, mobilized, and extensively taken into consideration.

Agreements must be made with selected leaders of the various ethno-religious groups of Iran, and a military invasion of part of Iran should lead immediately to proclamation of independent small states or to annexation with other neighboring states.

The country that can undertake this great work is Turkey. Turkey is Iran's only neighbor with military superiority over Tehran. In this regard, we do not take Pakistan into account, although it is a nuclear power, because viewed at the conventional level, Pakistan is not a significant military force.

More than this, Turkey is ideally located to attack Iran from its north-western confines, and quickly invade a vast part of Western Iran where no Persians live.

The arrival of Turkish army at Urumiyeh, Tabriz, Qazvin, Hamedan, and Khoramabad should be geared in a way to create enthusiastic reactions from the part of the indigenous, long tyrannized Aramaeans, Azeris, Turks, Turkmens, Soranis, Kurds and Loris.

With this done, Turkey, through parallel contacts with the other oppressed nations of Iran, the Aramaeans of Khuzestan, the Bakhtiaris, and the Baluchis, and through coordinated collaboration with Reza Pahlavi, Crown Prince of Iran, will not need to advance up to Tehran.

The announcement of his return would trigger a thunderous insurgence of the largely anti-Ayatollahs nationalist masses in Tehran, and his arrival in Tehran would herald the collapse of the theocratic regime, and the departure of the Turkish armies.

Turkey, Iran and the demise of the Ayatollahs regime

Only Turkey can bring about the demise of the dictatorial regime of the ignorant and paranoid Ayatollahs without major dangers for the global security; this conclusion is nothing new. Simply, this contradicts the ominous plans of the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge and their proxies, the nefarious and unrepresentative political establishments of England and France.

As a matter of fact, the world security is severely threatened by the machinations of this Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that intends to use Iran in order to generate a global crisis, involving an apocalyptic Middle East in flames, and America in clash with Russia and China, at a moment the US banks will all be declared bankrupt.

Back in March 1995, writing in the Turkish Daily News, I recommended that Turkey spearheads the ultimate dissolution of Iran, which is the only way for the ultimate democratization throughout the Iranian plateau. The arrival of the Turkish army in Urumiyeh, Tabriz, Qazvin, Hamedan and Khoramabad would trigger the following developments:

1. the rise of the independent Republic of Christian Aramaean Khuzestan (including present territories of the provinces Ilam and Khuzestan),

2. the secession of the provinces of Lorestan and Chaharmahal ve Bakhtiari (and Kohgiluyeh) in the Zagros mountains, and the formation of two small independent states (where the two mountainous nations, the Loris and the Bakhtiaris, would practice - free and for the first time in their long history - their culture, language, and national identity – independently from the Persian cultural radiation),

3. the constitution of an independent Baluchistan,

4. the secession of the provinces of Western Azerbaijan (capital: Urumiyeh) and Eastern Azerbaijan (capital: Tabriz), Ardabil and Gilan, and their subsequent merge with the independent state of Azerbaijan - in order to create a real national home for all the Azeris (who have been peremptorily divided between the Qadjar Empire of Iran and the, then advancing in Transcaucasia, Tsarist Russia), and

5. the secession of the provinces Kurdistan, Bakhtaran (Kermanshah), Hamedan, Zanjan, and Qazvin of Iran whereby live various peoples, namely Turks, Turkmens, Soranis, Kurds, etc. and the formation of an independent multicultural state.

With proper democratization processes advancing in Iran, the three countries, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Iran could merge in a great Oriental State whereby millennia of division, either Islamic or pre-Islamic, would end.

The only way to avoid a nuclear Iran or an apocalyptic showdown in the Middle East is this; America should soon realize that relying on a long date ally is far better than becoming the perennial victim of England, a gravely Anti-American and perfidious state, tool at the hands of the most evil enemies of America.

Through the present machination process, as perfectly manipulated against America by the Apostate Freemasonic Lodge that rules London and Paris, America is pushed to an impasse where all will be lost: stability in Oil price, Israel's existence, peace in the Middle East, and American economic power and military supremacy.

Article Source: http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard

About The Author: Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis - is Orientalist, Assyriologist, Egyptologist, Iranologist, Islamologist, Historian and Political Scientist. Dr. Megalommatis, 49, is the author of 12 books, dozens of scholarly articles, hundreds of encyclopedia entries, and thousands of articles. He speaks, reads and writes more than 15, modern and ancient, languages.

| View Profile & All Articles By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis |

		Post Comment
		Blog This Article!
		Discuss Article in Forum(s)
		Publication \| Reprint Terms

Please Rate this Article

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive The Middle East Articles Via RSS!

| Category Feeds | All-in-one Feed | Other Feed & Syndication Options |

Additional Articles From - Home | Politics | The Middle East

	Print This Article
	Post Comment
	Add To Favorites
	Email To Friends
	Ezine Ready \| Syndication
	Make PDF Article
	Post To del.icio.us
	Post To Furl
	Add To Google Bookmarks
	Submit To Netscape
	Add To Yahoo! My Web
	Add Main Feed To Outlook
	Post to BookMarks @ AfroArticles.com

	Post To BookMarkAfrica.com

Site Home

Article Categories

More Search Options

Site Map

Submit Articles

Top Authors

Most Recent Articles