Search:

Home | Afro Issues | African Insights | Political Corruption

Neo-Nazi 'Ethiopian' Pseudo-diplomats: Unrepresentative Liars

By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis
[

][Post to BookMarks @ AfroArticles.com]

[ Posted On: 2008-04-07 ]

To follow the generally accepted definition given by the Wikipedia, "Diplomacy is the art and practice of conducting negotiations between representatives of groups or states. It usually refers to international diplomacy, the conduct of international relations through the intercession of professional diplomats with regard to issues of peace-making, trade, war, economics and culture. International treaties are usually negotiated by diplomats prior to endorsement by national politicians" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomacy).

It goes without saying that representativity should be authenticated, legitimate, bona fide, and true. Who would believe Hitler's administrators as possible 'diplomats' of Holland that has been invaded and occupied by the Nazis during WW II?

Being representative of a country, diplomat or delegate implies the following:

1. participation in the specific ethnic, linguistic and/or religious group, people or nation the diplomat is bound to represent,

2. ability to speak the language of the nation the diplomat is bound to represent,

3. common faith with the diplomat's coreligionists, and

4. expression of respect of, and attachment to, the historical traditions and the cultural values shared by all the other natives of the same nations.

Can we truly suggest that Napoleon 'represented' Egypt before 208 years because he had simply conquered that Ottoman province? Certainly not.

Could we imagine that Soviet diplomats could possibly 'represent' Afghanistan that they invaded in 1979?

To what extent can we be blind enough to believe that Sudanese diplomats can possibly 'represent' – by means of their fake and unrepresentative embassies – Darfur, the vast province that became the target of the Khartoum dictator's thugs?

Iraqis do not 'represent' Kuwaitis – Amharas do not 'represent' Oromos

Could we possibly have accepted Iraqi diplomats, who spoke the same language and believed in the same religion as the outright majority of the Kuwaitis, to 'represent' Kuwait at the international level, following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait (August 2, 1990)?

But if the Iraqi diplomats cannot be accepted at the international level as possible 'representatives' of Kuwait, how can we suggest that Monophysitic Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian diplomats (who constitute more than 95% of the diplomatic staff of the so-called 'Ethiopian' embassies, although among the country's entire population, the Monophysitic Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians total ca. 17 – 18%) may be in a position to 'represent' the Muslim Afars and Ogadenis, and the Oromos either the latter are Waqqefanna followers, Muslims or Protestants?

One of the most excruciating aspects of the Neo-Nazi Abyssinian tyranny that under the name of 'Ethiopia' survived through ceaseless massacres of various subjugated nations is the Scandal of the misrepresentative 'Ethiopian' embassies.

We intend to expand on the subject, but in this first article we will publish and comment parts of an interview given by Mulatu Teshome, the ambassador of Abyssinia at Ankara (Turkey) to the Turkish daily Zaman (English edition) a few days ago.

'Ethiopian' Ambassador to Turkey: Common Liar and Forger

The 'Ethiopian' Ambassador's interview can be found in the following link: http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=137148.

Following a brief introduction, the title highlights the dictatorial mindset that prevails among the Neo Nazi Amhara and Tigray elites of Abyssinia. Then follows an introductory paragraph, and the main part of the interview. We re-publish the interview article integrally, encrusting numbers in the text; these numbers refer to comments that will be successively published at the end of the present article.

The brief introduction read as follows: "the Ethiopian ambassador to Turkey says Ethiopia is lucky 1 to have a society rich in diversity 2 and that members of all the country's different ethnicities consider themselves Ethiopian 3".

Ethiopian ambassador: Ethiopia does not need political reform

The people of Ethiopia brought in the new Ethiopian millennium 4 on Sep. 12, 2007. Ethiopians do not attach any particular religious meaning to the new millennium like some countries in the West; for them the millennium is all about looking to the future. 5

Ethiopians regard the new millennium as a period in which they will take their place among the emerging countries of the world. 6 They see it as a time for growth for their ancient country. 7 That is why Today's Zaman chose to speak to Ethiopian Ambassador to Turkey Mulatu Teshome.

Mr. Ambassador, why does the Ethiopian millennium fall at a different time than the one celebrated by much of the world?

- The Ethiopian calendar is a slightly revised version of the Julian calendar. The Western world uses the Gregorian calendar, which was actually a later invention. Ethiopians stuck to their old tradition and continued with the Orthodox calendar, which is seven or eight years behind the Gregorian one. 8 This is also about the firm belief in the Orthodox Church as it is the original, the authentic one. 9 The Roman Catholics and other religious groups all came in later periods.

- Do the Ethiopian people attach any special religious meaning to the millennium, like a second coming of Jesus?

- Some of the clergy hold such expectations, but the country as a whole 10 sees this as a time to look to the future while also preserving the ancient culture of Ethiopia.

- What do you mean by ancient?

- Ethiopia is a very ancient country, a 11 country that has a history of more than 3,000 years. It is referred to as the "cradle of mankind." 12 It is where Lucy, the world's oldest-known almost complete hominid 13 skeleton -- more than 3.3 million years old -- was discovered by an archaeology team. 14 Recently, archeologists also found the skeleton of a 3-year-old girl, "Selam," who died 3.45 million years ago, in the Afar region of eastern Ethiopia. 15

- When you said future, were you referring to the people's political and economic expectations for the new millennium?

- Yes, indeed. Ethiopia is a very ancient country, but its economy does not reflect its history and tradition. 16 Ethiopia is still a very backward country. So the aspiration of the Ethiopian people is to make Ethiopia, within the next two decades, rank near the middle among all countries for per capita income. That calls for very rapid economic development, of course. The new millennium for Ethiopia is regarded as a new chapter in our history.

- Do you see any political reforms coming in the future?

- Frankly speaking, Ethiopia does not need any political reform. 17 We previously were ruled by a monarchy. 18 It was banned in 1975 with the Ethiopian Revolution. 19 From 1975 to 1991 Ethiopia was ruled by a military dictatorship and was regarded a socialist country. 20 Of course, neither one brought modernity to Ethiopia. During that period Ethiopia did not even approach democracy. In 1991 a new era started; the military dictatorship was overthrown, and we started drawing up a new constitution. This is a constitution based on the modern thinking of democratic governance that recognizes private ownership. 21 But what really makes the Ethiopian Constitution new and democratic is the fact that it was drafted through popular participation in a process that lasted from 1991 to 1995. 22

By 1995 the constitution was adopted, and in compliance with this new constitution we held elections. The elections take place every five years. What we need is to practice what is contained within the constitution, not more political reform. 23 We have a very good constitutional framework; what is expected from the government is to realize what is written there. 24

- Every country has its problems. What do you see as the main ones Ethiopia faces?

- Ethiopia is lucky to have a very diverse society. All of these different ethnicities say they belong to their tribes, but when it comes to their country they are all Ethiopian. 25 They have only one roof over them, and that roof is Ethiopia. 26 Having said that, we of course had problems in the past and we still have some. These come mainly in the form of terrorist groups 27 which are manipulated mainly from abroad.

- Are these separatist groups or otherwise?

- Well, these groups don't have civilian demands. 28 Sometimes they use the slogans of a given regime or ethnic group and demand more freedom and more economic development. We have no problem with that. What we are against is taking up arms and sabotaging the security of the population. 29 Unfortunately most of these terrorist groups are linked to Eritrea. 30 You know, Eritrea was a province of Ethiopia in the past, 31 and today it is cultivating these elements within Ethiopia. 32

- What is the reason for this enmity?

- Eritrea was once a province of Ethiopia. It received independence through a referendum in 1991. Before that there was not a clear boundary, because Eritrea was a part of Ethiopia. 33 The division between Eritrea and Ethiopia is not ethnic or national. That part of Ethiopia was occupied by the Italians for 63 years and during the occupation they developed a separate identity. Today the two identities are clashing. 34

- When we speak of Ethiopia, we use the term "Gateway of Africa." Does this label seem accurate to you? 35

- I think it is quite accurate. Geographically its location in the northeastern part of Africa makes Ethiopia best placed strategically in its region. 36 You can fly easily from there to the Middle East, to Asia and to Europe. Of course, this is facilitated by Ethiopian Airlines. It flies to almost all countries in Africa. In addition, the headquarters of the African Union is in Ethiopia; 37 the headquarters of the UN's Economic Commission for Africa is also in Addis Ababa. 38 And many international regional headquarters are there. So basically Ethiopia is the capital of Africa. 39

- When were diplomatic relations between Ethiopia and Turkey established?

- Our relations reach back to the Ottoman period, to the 1560s. But real diplomatic relations started just before World War I. 40 Ethiopia had very close contacts with the sultan of the Ottomans at that time, and in 1912 a Turkish Consulate was opened in Ethiopia. Ethiopia was the only independent country in Africa then 41 and it was the only country recognized as a state. In 1925 Turkey opened its embassy in Addis Ababa. Turkey was the sixth country to open an embassy in Ethiopia. 42 Ethiopia also had an embassy in Ankara. Our emperor, Haile Selassie, visited Turkey two times. But in 1975, after the socialist revolution, Ethiopia closed down its embassy. For a long time we didn't have a presence in Ankara; we reopened our embassy only in 2006. Today the relations between Turkey and Ethiopia are excellent, both politically and economically. We have no conflicts of interest and we support each other on international platforms. 43 We are enjoying strong economic relations and witnessing a growing number of Turkish investors coming to Ethiopia. Our mutual trade has grown from nothing to approximately $200 million annually, and our target is $500 million.

- When we speak about Ethiopians in Turkey, the Queen of Sheba comes to mind. Is this a myth or a historical reality? 44

- The Queen of Sheba is not a myth. 45 If you go to the northern part of Ethiopia, to Aksu, 46 you can see the ruins of her palace. 47 She was the empress of Ethiopia 48 and having heard of a powerful emperor in the north, she visited Solomon. 49 They fell in love and on her way back to Ethiopia she became pregnant. After she returned she gave birth to a boy and named him Menelik. Menelik I was the emperor, the son of Solomon. 50 That line actually ruled Ethiopia until 1975. 51

- So the family of the emperor is the family of Solomon. Does the family still have social and religious importance in Ethiopia?

- From the first emperor to the last, they were highly respected and were considered gods among people. The emperor was called King of Kings, Elect of God, Lion of Judah, Emperor of Emperors. 52 After 1975 that respect faded; the members of the royal family left the country, some were imprisoned and even after their release they left for England and the US. Some, of course, returned after the change in political regime, but as only common citizens. They are no longer a threat to the democracy. They know that the Lion of Judah is not going to return to power.

- The Ark of the Covenant is in Ethiopia also? 52

- It is in Ethiopia, again in Aksu. Every year on Nov. 28 or 29 Ethiopians organize a very big celebration around the temple where the ark is kept. Not only the ark, but also the true cross, as people call it, is in Ethiopia. So there is potential for religious tourism. I invite Turks to come and invest in Ethiopia, but also to visit Lake Tana, 53 the source of the Blue Nile, and our national parks. Ethiopia's natural beauty, in my opinion, is not comparable to that of any other country in the world.

Comments

1. In fact, this is a figure of speech; happy can one nation be only if they can freely practice their traditions, worship their God, organize their affairs as they find best, speaking their own language, and ruling their territory. In the cemetery 'Ethiopia' this is not the case for the Ogadeni nation, the Oromo nation, the Afar nation, the Sidama nation, the Anuak nation, the Kaffa nation, the Shekacho nation, the Kambata nation, the Agaw nation and the Wolayita nation. These oppressed nations cannot enjoy the fake 'diversity' the irrelevant and unrepresentative 'Ethiopian' 'ambassador' is talking about; they are all oppressed and deprived of their rights; secession, independence and national self-determination are options denied to them by the Neo – Nazi Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians who intentionally want these nations to remain included in a state that is not theirs, in a state manned by their vicious enemies, the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians who despise and discriminate them, in a state formed against their own survival.

How the Amhara and Tigray saw the nations they invaded

2. The mendacity of the pseudo-ambassador's words is obvious; if he had been happy with this 'diversity', there would have never been so many, ruthless efforts of linguistic, cultural and religious amharization of all the aforementioned nations. If the Amhara and Tigray racist and barbaric elites of Abyssinia had been happy with this 'diversity', there would have been ten departments of Sidama literature in the local universities for Amhara and Tigray students to be "happy with this diversity"; but of course, this is not the case. In fact, never did the Amhara and Tigray racist and barbaric elites of Abyssinia respect the religious, cultural, linguistic and national identity of the nations they invaded.

They saw in them a 'stuff' they could play with at will, a material to transform, re-shape, and transfigure, a substance that would bring them income, helping them accumulate riches that of course are not theirs. If these nations, this 'stuff', denied to be used according to the racist, criminal, and even perverse Amhara / Tigray Abyssinian will, it would automatically become expendable, a throwaway trash of lesser value than the worst mosquitoes. That's why they constantly, ceaselessly and unrepentantly call them 'insects'.

The diversity the mendacious, irrelevant and unrepresentative 'Ethiopian' 'ambassador' is talking about is the diversity of the spoons; you can use them in your cup of coffee, in your soup plate, in your strawberry bowl. If these spoons happen to be human beings and actually reject to be used as tools, they are indifferently sold as slaves, mercilessly murdered, malignantly tortured, and limitlessly oppressed.

3. This is utter lie; the oppressed nations do not consider themselves 'Ethiopian'; they are pressurized, oppressed and tyrannized to confess so, lest they be labeled 'terrorists' and 'dangerous elements', and get subsequently eliminated. The national, cultural, religious and linguistic identity of these nations has been incessantly targeted by the Abyssinian racist elites who want to de-personify, de-humanize, bestialize, and utterly and irreversibly assimilate all these nations. What the mendacious pseudo-ambassador says represents only his own wish – a truly Neo-Nazi will of massive, spiritual (otherwise physical) extermination of a great number of African nations.

The Pseudo-Ethiopian Millennium of Ignorance, Oppression and Theft

4. The so-called 'new Ethiopian millennium' is a forgery; at its real, historical dimension the Abyssinian (not 'Ethiopian') millennium is the result of the ignorance and extensive illiteracy of the Axumite Abyssinian monks who were not able to cope with their Egyptian Coptic, Aramaean, Greek and Roman counterparts in the early 6th century CE. For detailed analysis of the historical background: 'The Bogus-Ethiopian Millennium of Ignorance and Aberration', and 'Gueze – 'Ethiopian': the Counterfeit Millennium'.

Beyond the issue of the historical reasons for which the Abyssinian calendar was not adequately synchronized with all the rest, there is a vast political issue. The so-called 'new Ethiopian millennium' for which the racist pseudo-ambassador seems to speak proudly is utterly rejected by the outright majority of the populations imprisoned in Abyssinia.

The Abyssinian calendar is not part of the culture and the historical traditions of the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Anuak, the Shekachos, the Kaffas, the Agaws, the Kambattas, and the Wolayitas. The Abyssinian calendar is a purely Amhara and Tigray Abyssinian affair, and this means that it may have a cultural value for only 30 – 31% of the entire population of Abyssinia. This is just a first approach.

However, if we further scrutinize the affair, we come to realize that this Monophysitic (heretic Christian) calendar does not concern and is not revered by the Abyssinian Muslims, who are among the most terribly oppressed groups of Abyssinia.

The Bogus - "Ethiopian" Millennium of the 18% of the Country's Population

Among the Abyssinians (Amhara and Tigray), the Muslims amount to ca. 40% of the population, which means that in fact the Abyssinian calendar does not represent a cultural value for more than 18% of the total population of the country. This is the reality that the fallacious ambassador intended to cover, when talking to the journalists of the Turkish newspaper Zaman (Time).

His mendacious speech is a criminal act intended to erase from the map the cultural, religious, historical, and national identity of all these nations for whom the ambassador's millennium is an act of enmity and discrimination performed at the prejudice of their calendars, religions, cultures, historical heritage, traditions and values.

In an impoverished country like Abyssinia the event takes another dimension, namely that of the fraudulent attitude of the racist Abyssinian elites who spent an incredibly high amount of money for the tyrannical minority's pompous pseudo-millennium festival, constraining the outright majority to starvation. The criminal ambassador's millennium festival was just an unprecedented embezzlement of resources of which the rightful proprietor were the starving, subjugated nations of Abyssinia.

5. Looking for the future means, for all the tyrannized nations of Abyssinia, secession, independence, freedom, national and cultural identity, socioeconomic progress, and disposal of the Abyssinian racist tyrants.

6. This is the comedy that the successive, monarchical (Menelik to Haile Selassie), communist (Mengistu) and pseudo-republican (Meles Zenawi), Abyssinian tyrants promised and were unable to deliver. The reason is simple and in and by itself trashes the entire argumentation of the unrepresentative pseudo-ambassador; all the oppressed nations and religious groups that amount to ca. 82 – 83% of the country's population are prone to passive resistance, because they resolutely reject the Neo-Nazi tyranny of the alien Abyssinians. As they do not perform, the country is plunged into apathy, and it will undisputedly be so until the most loathed and reviled tyranny breaks down to pieces.

Only the split of the pseudo-Ethiopian tyranny will trigger development and progress in Eastern Africa.

No common historical background between Kushitic Ethiopians and Semitic Abyssinians

7. The reference to an 'ancient country' is historically fallacious and politically racist and Neo-Nazi. Certainly most of the oppressed nations of Abyssinia have a glorious past that antedates the Abyssinian past, which can be retraced to Yemen. Before the Habashat tribe crossed the Red Sea to settle in the coast around Adulis (near today's Massawa, in Eritrea) and Axum (in the Tigray province), the Kushitic Oromos' ancestors were building pyramids in their kingdom, Ethiopia, in the area of today's Sudan. The Nilo-Saharan Anuak's ancestors were there, and other Kushitic nations' forefathers can also be retraced throughout NE African Past. The Ogadenis' ancestors, along with the ancient inhabitants of Somalia, retrace their past to the historical kingdom of Punt that had recorded relations with Egypt since the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE. But none of them had anything in common with the Yemenite Abyssinians.

And they will never have anything in common, no culture, no religion, no historical past, no traditions, and no socio-behavioural system, with the Amhara and Tigray Abyssinians, who foolishly propagate the theory that through their tyranny they will forge a most undesired and unsolicited union. Their ridiculous assumption testifies however to their totalitarian and racist nature.

8. The Abyssinian pseudo-ambassador, Mulatu Teshome, is ignorant and his answer proves that he never got an idea of the issue. Here it is proper to refer again to the aforementioned articles about the erroneous Abyssinian millennium: 'The Bogus-Ethiopian Millennium of Ignorance and Aberration', and 'Gueze – 'Ethiopian': the Counterfeit Millennium'.

More specifically, the ignorant ambassador fails to understand that the 7 years difference has nothing to do with the Gregorian and the Julian calendars, and that the so-called 'Orthodox' calendar (he means the Egyptian Coptic Calendar) is not "seven or eight years behind the Gregorian one". The use of the term 'Orthodox' is most confusing, and the Abyssinians have nothing to do with Christian Orthodoxy. Along with their guidance, the Egyptian Coptic Patriarchate, the Abyssinians follow what the Orthodox and Catholic churches designate as Monophysitism. Of course, the Abyssinian version of Monophysitism is very different from the Egyptian one, and a great number of non Christian practices are acceptable by the Abyssinian heresy.

9. Even worse, the Axumite Abyssinian church is not the most ancient, as there was no Christianity in Abyssinia before the arrival of Frumentius, an Aramaean priest, in the very beginning of the 4th century CE. The ignorant Abyssinian pseudo-ambassador, saying "the Roman Catholics and other religious groups all came in later periods", proves that has no idea about the History of Christianity. And his depleted English language is extremely poor; he means denominations, not 'groups'.

Fake 'Ethiopia': 18% tyrannize 82% of the population

10. Behind this unconscious confession of the Abyssinian pseudo-ambassador, one gets a most clear and transparent vision of the sociopolitical reality that prevails in the tyranny of Abyssinia. The Monophysitic Amhara – Tigray Abyssinian clergy have few followers (as we specified earlier, they amount to ca. 18%), and the outright majority are indifferent (poetically said as "sees this as a time to look to the future"). What this indescribable ambassador forgot to say is why the official state imposes as state dogma the apocalyptic pseudo-vision of the Abyssinian monks, the notorious, revengeful and heinous 'debteraw'.

11. The ambassador is contradicted by all historians, experts, and academia – except of course the ignorant Amhara and Tigray forgers who are easily hired in the so-called universities of Abyssinia, and some marginal colonial pseudo-historiographers like the notorious Pankhurst. History needs scripture, textual evidence; archeological findings alone do not help establish real History. Periods we know only through archeological evidence are part of what worldwide academia call 'Pre-history'. The earliest Gueze (Ge'ez) inscriptions do not go beyond the 1st half of the 1st millennium BCE; as such they have derived from the Ancient Yemenite writing system, which is an additional proof of the overwhelming Yemenite stamp on Axumite Abyssinia. In Abyssinia, we cannot speak about proper History for more than 2000 years; even so, our knowledge is fragmentary for several periods for which we have no documentation either in the very beginning of the Axumite Kingdom (the pre-Christian periods of Axum) or after the Islamic invasions, and the collapse of Axum.

Cradle of the Mankind: Mesopotamia, Egypt, not Ethiopia or Abyssinia

12. With the exception of the unrepresentative ambassador, no one calls either Abyssinia or Ethiopia (in the area of today's Sudan) "cradle of mankind". Lucy and all the eventual hominids (which is in itself a vast subject of discussion) form no continuity with the real, historical Mankind. One can call Mesopotamia as "cradle of mankind" (where the Sumerians, the Elamites already in the last quarter of the 4th millennium BCE invented writing systems, and later also the Akkadians – Assyrians / Babylonians developed a great civilization), one can call Egypt as "cradle of mankind" (where the hieroglyphic writing was developed in the beginning of the 3rd millennium BCE), but certainly not Kushitic Ethiopia. And the term applies even less to Semitic Abyssinia, the ancestors of the uneducated and unrepresentative ambassador, who insists on fallaciously calling his country "Ethiopia" (and not Abyssinia).

13. Paleontology and Anthropology have nothing to do with History, but this is too much of a detail for the impetuous pseudo-ambassador.

14. Pretending to support evolutionist approaches may be dangerous for the unrepresentative ambassador. The real masters of his country are the monks, the debteraw who rule behind the scenes; they should not be very happy with this sort of statements.

15. According to this comical effort to 'link' the Mankind with mere paleontological findings, everything started in Afar land where the Muslim population is striving to get rid of Amhara – Tigray tyranny. The Kushitic Afars are all Muslims and as ferociously oppressed, they totally reject their illegal annexation by Abyssinia at the end of the 19th century. So, an Amhara or Tigray Abyssinian has nothing to claim.

16. And there is no case in which the economy would reflect the history and the tradition in fake 'Ethiopia'. The country does not exist but as a jail; it never acquired a minimal form of unity, as the disparate elements, which have been regrouped by force by the cruel Abyssinian rulers, diverged even more because of the loathsome oppression and the excruciating forms of tyranny practiced. Nations with no historical and cultural link have no chance to homogenize for economic needs – even worse if these needs reflect the criminal, racist agenda of barbaric tribal chieftains.

The Amhara / Tigray Tyranny "does not need any Political Reform"!

17. This brief sentence of the representative of Africa's worst tyranny says it all; as if Abyssinia were a Paradise and there is no need for change, improvement, progress and enlightenment, the ambassador of the Abyssinian abyss pretends that Africa's most appalling tyranny "does not need any political reform"!

This statement does not differ from what Hitler and Stalin would have said in 1939 about their respective tyrannical countries. This is the real face of the criminal Abyssinian ambassadors who steel the money of starving nations whom they supposedly represent - in order to just contribute to these nations' extinction.

18. This is half the truth; it would be correct, if said about the Amhara and the Tigray, as the 'monarchy' was theirs – only! But the subjugated and tyrannized nations of the Oromos, the Ogadenis, the Afars, the Sidamas, the Anuak, the Shekachos, the Kaffas, the Agaws, the Kambattas, and the Wolayitas were not ruled by "their" monarchy.

They were subjugated, oppressed and dehumanized by an atrocious and heinous invader, who operated against them the most inhuman policies of genocide and physical / spiritual extermination. The Abyssinian monarchy was an alien invader for more than 70% of the subjugated populations, and a loathsome realm of intolerant religious fanatics for another 12 – 13%.

19. There was no 'Ethiopian' revolution. By saying so, the unrepresentative and unrepentant ambassador simply reconfirms his attachment to the communist dictatorial regime of the Amhara gangster Mengistu. The so-called 'revolution' was an Abyssinian military coup geared to prolong the oppression of non Abyssinian, tyrannized nations.

Mengistu supporters in Zenawi's clique and the Neo-Nazi Kinijit party?

The fact that supporters of the communist dictator are still part of the Abyssinian corps diplomatique should be most embarrassing for the UN, the US, and the EU.

How can one hope to convince that respect of Human Rights in Tibet is an issue, when one accepts diplomatic relics of the Mengistu era? The expression used by the unrepresentative ambassador 'military dictatorship' cannot even be taken as criticism, let alone denunciation.

20. "Regarded as a socialist country": this what the unrepresentative Abyssinian ambassador has to say about the criminal Amhara tyranny of Mengistu who caused millions of Oromos and other tyrannized nations to starve and die. In fact, communist Amhara-ruled Abyssinia was not a socialist country; it was the Hell-on-Earth.

21. Comical statement; if the Amhara barbaric and illiterate pseudo-kings and the Amhara pro-communist colonels did not bring "modernity to Ethiopia", certainly the pseudo-federal, bogus-republican Tigray tyrants did not bring it either! With Internet penetration at abysmally low levels, fake 'Ethiopia's is a failure that in and by itself proves that countries simply do not function if one nation imposes a tyranny over the rest, who all want to just secede. The country cannot stand together; this is the conclusion of the 'Ethiopian' failure.

The constitution may be any possible text one would choose, but as long as it is not implemented, it is a non-subject. According to the constitution, a referendum can be organized and a nation (f. i. the Afars or the Ogadenis) can decide about secession and independence. However, this never takes place, as the tyrannical Zenawi government does not rule according to the iconic constitution.

22. It is true that, in the aftermath of the decomposition of the Mengistu Amhara communist regime, many had hoped that the numerous tyrannized nations of Ethiopia would meet democracy, freedom and independence. The deception was terrible, and it only helped convince every one that the primary concern of all the oppressed and tyrannized nations of Abyssinia should be to isolate the Amhara – Tigray Abyssinians, and pursue the struggle for secession and independence at all costs.

From Racist Sarcasm to Sardonic Ethio-Nazism

23. This is the Neo-Nazi identity of the Abyssinian regime: the constitution is not implemented by those who, having the absolute power in their hands, demand in public that the political establishment practices "what is contained within the constitution". This is clearly duplicitous, abhorrently hypocritical, and inhumanly sarcastic.

The only thing the Abyssinian regime should have to arrange, in order to let the constitution be properly implemented, is to withdraw the criminal thugs and death squads (whom they shamefully call 'national army') from Ogaden, and call the UN and international experts and observers to organize a Referendum for Ogaden's Independence; then, they could pursue the same policy in Afar Land, Oromia, Sidama Land, etc.

24. It now becomes sardonic; the only thing the unrepresentative ambassador should have to do is just to get an air ticket back home, and help his gang members in the government and the administration to re-read the text of the constitution that they had written, but never realized.

We will complete our criticism in a forthcoming article.

Article Source: http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard

About The Author: Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis - is Orientalist, Assyriologist, Egyptologist, Iranologist, Islamologist, Historian and Political Scientist. Dr. Megalommatis, 51, is the author of 12 books, dozens of scholarly articles, hundreds of encyclopedia entries, and thousands of articles. He speaks, reads and writes more than 15, modern and ancient, languages.

| View Profile & All Articles By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis |

		Post Comment
		Blog This Article!
		Discuss Article in Forum(s)
		Publication \| Reprint Terms

Please Rate this Article

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Political Corruption Articles Via RSS!

| Category Feeds | All-in-one Feed | Other Feed & Syndication Options |

Additional Articles From - Home | Afro Issues | African Insights | Political Corruption

	Print This Article
	Post Comment
	Add To Favorites
	Email To Friends
	Ezine Ready \| Syndication
	Make PDF Article
	Post To del.icio.us
	Post To Furl
	Add To Google Bookmarks
	Submit To Netscape

	Add To Yahoo! My Web
	Add Main Feed To Outlook
	Post to BookMarks @ AfroArticles.com

	Post To BookMarkAfrica.com

Site Home

Article Categories

More Search Options

Site Map

Submit Articles

Top Authors

Most Recent Articles