Search:

Hate-America Campaign On The Rise: "Victims" Of Perceived "American Empire" May Leave

[ Posted On: 2007-02-21 ]

"Nemesis" is a bushfire in winter that burns wild and wide. It inflames twiggy dry minds and ignitable emotion to hate America.

The casualty of this mental and emotional arson is reality. The victims are those who, in one breath, love and hate America.

Let me point this out to you. There is no such thing as "illegal war" if that's what you think of the war in Iraq. If you love America and at the same time attack America for engaging in an "illegal war" that you imagined, something is terribly wrong.

Those who are true to their faith as they are to their political conviction that to hate America would stop the war in Iraq, and the fate of their faith is to believe that to shoot illegal aliens dead will solve the immigration problem of this country, a spiritual healer is what they desperately need. It is a mirage in the sand of virtual reality. Neither of those is going to happen.

They need a faith healer to restore their faith in America where life is a sprinkle of pepper and salt in the land of milk and honey.

We cannot have our cake and eat it too, the saying goes. If we enjoy our good life in America that we cannot have if we live elsewhere and yet hate America for providing us what we want, we become a walking contradiction and a talking paradox. It could be that those in this predicament are suffering a certain kind of disorder otherwise known as "Nemesis Syndrome".

To put an end to the misery of those who hate America, they can leave this land and live in Timbuktu, "… a place extremely far away and regarded by many as a myth …" [1] where solitary recluses love to live and hide from the wherewithal as well as wickedness of what they perceived as a "cruel world".

The academia and the Liberal media have their share of prescient critics of the so-called growing "American Empire". In Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic, America was attacked: [America is] "… a secret government increasingly characterized by covert activities, enormous 'black' budgets, and near dictatorial executive power; a misguided republic that has betrayed its noblest ideals and most basic founding principals in pursuit of disastrously conceived notions of security, stability, and progress." [2]

Hate-America copycats mouth this attack and similar others. Lacking originality when criticizing America, angry fleas on top of a raging bull are trying to intimidate President Bush when they attack him that they are bigger and taller [on top of the bull] than the charging bulls themselves. Because they even hardly understand the tirades they mimic from the book, flea-like critics are hardly coherent. But this is not just what is despicable.

What is loathsome and disgraceful to the American public that knew what those second-hand itchy parasitic critics are doing is that there is no indication of shame or sign of embarrassment for just being imitators and impersonators in the on-going hate-Bush-kick-America liberal campaign. Self-respect of impressionists of this kind flies out of the window when they hurl stolen invectives against America and against George W. Bush as the country's badly battered President encountering extreme difficulties in driving the affairs of state through opposition roadblocks.

The most serious accusation that attempts to erase mighty America from the map was that this country's massive war industrial complex does not only make America the world's strongest military superpower, and the most powerful and the richest nation on the planet, but also the fact that our military establishment and national defense industry make America richer and richer by manufacturing and selling arms for humongous profits in blood.

In other words, this attack on America is saying that this country lives a dirty kind of life at the expense of humankind destroyed by American weapons used by client nations in different parts of the globe in their wars of aggression and self-defense.

With this rant calculated to strike the heart of the American public as a sentimental tearjerker, my sympathy goes to those who cannot stand their agony for living in America as victims of this delusional evil "American Empire".

To them, this I have to say with honesty, candor and humility: For their health and to avoid being called hypocritical ingrates, their kind should leave the United States and live in total isolation but in peace, if not in Timbuktu, in some pristine islands in the Pacific where they can launch their complaints against this imagined vicious "American Empire" for as long their lives last or hell freezes over, whichever comes first. There in God's forsaken land, they can no longer be part of filthy-rich America they abhorred and condemned - the "American Empire" that gives them those publicized episodes of nightmare.

But here in the United States of America, country-bashers of their kind are discordant and terribly misplaced when they start attacking America. Basking in the sunshine of abundance and easy life in America, protected by the mightiest security never seen anywhere in the world, and enjoying the kind of freedom, justice, liberty and pursuit of happiness that only America could provide to those who seek them as a matter of life and death, a morally immaculate country-basher living in the comfort of this imagined immoral "American Empire" cannot live with us. There is this danger of harm, physical, spiritual and otherwise as a result of their kind being looked down as noxious skunks or strange predatory animals in the zoo.

Until they leave this country, we have this political pain-in-the-neck Green- House-effect-pollution - some kind of a "Nemesis" foul air we have to breathe 24 hours a day. It is definitely bad to our mental health, and bad for America.

"Nemesis" haters of America also denounced our soldiery as having been infested with "… swaggering soldiers who brawl and sometimes rape." [Refer to Note (2)] It also warned of the collapse of the evil "American Empire" from within.

The problem with this delusive attack against our soldiers and the trouble with this hallucinating prediction of a coming catastrophe is that when a worm or two are found in an apple or two in a basketful of apples, it is totally a juvenile thinking to call the basket full of apples as a basket of worms. Only a delirious mind would have the temerity to call this country's finest soldiery that the whole world admires, as a basket of worms [brawlers and rapists].

It is true that there are cases where soldiers are accused of rape as there are cases where respectable intellectual elites are charged of rapes. But it is this juvenile delinquent thinking in the basket-of-worm analogy that really rips the country apart, and rapes the reputation of our soldiers, which could bring the collapse of America from within.

This "Nemesis" anti-American mind had already stirred the American public to a revolt paving the way to a possible implosion of America that has been targeted by way of beating the drum of accusation that the President of the United States has engaged this country in an "illegal war" in Iraq.

In the academe and the UN, I have stayed long enough to find out that there is no such thing as "illegal war" in the study of international law and law of nations when responding to an invasion or devastating surprise attack. That the war in Iraq is "illegal" exists only in the imagination of those who have a planned agenda to execute and accomplish. War is only declared "illegal" out of diplomatic bias, especially from a particular party's standpoint to pursue an agenda or to justify a country-interest. War declared "illegal" by a party or parties in interest can never be illegal to the other party or parties in casus belli [justification for acts of war]. This happens to be true because if you serve in the United Nations, the first lesson of experience you will learn is that self-interest is bias in international relations.

For example, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan is known to be a puppet of the radical left that pursues the agenda of global liberalism against capitalism. The United States is a supreme capitalist advocate for a global economy. The left opposed globalization that the United States espoused. Thus, there is no doubt as to where Annan's bias lies. This pointer alone strikes you right away as an initiated diplomat, with knowledge as to what the UN body is all about, how it functions and how it is ran. As a UN representative, you do not only behave accordingly but must also conduct the course of action you represent within the ambit of this diplomatic reality.

Aside from Annan's bias, as head of UN he is also known for his incompetence in leading the world into a path of chaos. This is neither debated nor ignored at the same time by diplomats. Never before respect for this world body has been rated so low since Annan took over.

Many instances of incompetence are not hard to find in the UN archive and cite as evidentiary exhibits.

For example, coming right through his leftist bias, Annan argued that U.S.'s going to war in Iraq should have been first approved by the Security Council. His prejudice surfaced when he wanted the UNSC "… to rule on whether the US and its allies were under imminent threat."[3]

As a disquieted American citizen or permanent resident in America that suffered a terrorist attack, you would probably react with a wicked insult out of this hellish disbelief: What the hell was Annan talking about when Islam terrorists trained and harbored in Iraq and Afghanistan, hit the East Coast? Was America not under "imminent threat" and instead safer after it was attacked?

Stupidity and ignorance rise to the fore when one is blinded by bias. Annan could no longer see what's going on in the records of the UN because of his prejudice. The "… the Security Council had already approved the use of force in resolution 1441 … warning of 'serious consequences' if Iraq failed to give a complete accounting of its weapons programmes." [Refer to Note (3)].

In total defiance of this UN resolution, Iraq did not come up with that required "complete accounting" of Saddam Hussein's weapons program.

Any diplomat that works in the United Nations except Annan would know that the right of the state to self-defense when attacked as in the case of the United States is guaranteed by the UN Charter. This self-defense includes a pre-emptive strike the threatened state may exercise for survival. Did this biased UN Secretary-General think of 9/11 as a friendly joust of chivalry between the aggressor and the victim of aggression? Didn't he notice the outrage of this nation, or hear the plaintive cry of the dead, of the thousand voices of the dying buried under the rubbles, that reverberated in the four corners of the globe?

Nothing on earth - not even the United Nations - can question this nation's "sovereign authority" to use force when responding to devastating sneak attacks of December 7, 1941 in Pearl Harbor and September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, D.C., with or without any UN resolutions. With attacks of this kind against this country, nothing except God could prevent the United States from going to war. I said, absolutely nothing … negative … zero … nada…! Obviously, Annan ignored this absolute right to war under the doctrine of casus belli. This is what happens when intense bias render one's thought process kaput.

To say the kindest in mind, I was shocked by this blatant display of ignorance if not stupidity by no less than the present leadership of the United Nations. The UN is not what it was before. These ignorance and stupidity of the incumbent UN leadership infected most if not all the zombies of the radical left that marched down the streets in protest of what they thought was an "illegal" war in Iraq.

Much as street radicals were infected, so were the Democrats and Rinos in Congress. They passed and approved resolutions "that have no binding effect" condemning the war in Iraq. The no-support sentiment expressed, proceeds from the proposition that the war was "illegal". Congress people are no doubt wise to the point of lying that the war is "illegal" [it exists only in the imagination] to harness the sympathy of the American public into supporting their 2008 presidential agenda.

To the educated or to the learned who knew what the war in Iraq is all about, there is no such thing as "illegal war" that has ever been written in stone. The ignorant are being taken advantage of and the public is taken for a ride. This I have to stress because it is very important that this pigment of the imagination should be publicly exposed: "Illegal war" exists only in the mind of street-copycats that "Nemesis" has contaminated in a whirlpool of publicly orchestrated anti-war protests.

To survive the terror of Islamic jihad, this nation does not need to be loved by the enemy. [4] It needs to be feared by terrorists and their left wing sympathizers. The reason for this is that this country cannot impose love. But it can impose fear that commands obedience. Fear stopped our attackers on their track, rendering their plan to annihilate us sterile and inoperative, at least for a long while.

The only living person on earth that terrorists feared the most is George W. Bush, President of the United States. Radicals diseased by the spreading "Nemesis" contagion that I have just described had not paused for a moment to wonder why for the last six years since 9/11 they have never been attacked by Al Qaeda terrorists that had been pursued and up to now are still on the run for their lives. They are being hunted down like animals they deserved.

Since the Democrats took over Congress last January 2007, hate-America is on the rise. Those who hate America should not destroy themselves emotionally and mentally by staying here in bad, bad America. To preserve their own sanity, they can invoke their freedom to leave.

To stay is infra dignitatem . In America, living beneath one's dignity without credibility is a tragic loss of self-recognition and identity, and the person becomes a nonentity. Scientists of the mind had pointed out that in many cases, without self-recognition and without knowing who the person is, take away the reason to live - the case of the living dead.

What makes it more tragic is that the "bad America" that was created in their mind, won't go away. It is here to stay till the end of time.

The dice is loaded against those who hate this land of the free. "Bad America" will not leave them alone as long as they live here.

If they do not leave America which according to them is a "misguided Republic" that burns in hell the kind of life they live, they must know that they are here to roast. #

Article Source: http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard

About The Author: Edwin A. Sumcad is a veteran diplomat-journalist and for more than 45 years a recipient of numerous excellence awards in journalism. His editorial insights appear in other publications and published in several websites. A brief comment may be e-mailed to ed.superx722[at]yahoo.com.sg. [Please replace [at] with @]

| View Profile & All Articles By: Edwin A. Sumcad |

		Post Comment
		Blog This Article!
		Discuss Article in Forum(s)
		Publication \| Reprint Terms

Please Rate this Article

# of Ratings = 5 | Rating = 3.4/5

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive The Americas Articles Via RSS!

| Category Feeds | All-in-one Feed | Other Feed & Syndication Options |

Additional Articles From - Home | Politics | The Americas

	Print This Article
	Post Comment
	Add To Favorites
	Email To Friends
	Ezine Ready \| Syndication
	Make PDF Article
	Post To del.icio.us
	Post To Furl
	Add To Google Bookmarks
	Submit To Netscape
	Add To Yahoo! My Web
	Add Main Feed To Outlook
	Post to BookMarks @ AfroArticles.com

	Post To BookMarkAfrica.com

Site Home

Article Categories

More Search Options

Site Map

Submit Articles

Top Authors

Most Recent Articles