Search:

European Union, African Union, and the fictitious 'Arab' League

[ Posted On: 2007-04-04 ]

Referring to the European and the African Unions, we easily notice that the only thing they have in common is the word 'union,' which means of course different things under different circumstances.

European Union is based on Knowledge

European Union is a state-under-formation, a unique procedure in the History of Mankind in which political willingness came after correct historical knowledge attained in leading universities. Not a single case of historical misunderstanding – let alone falsification of history – can be detected in today's European universities; either European or World history is concerned.

Simply, the academic research and scholarship proceeds through successive readjustments, reconsiderations and modifications of the truth acquired by eliminating previous inaccuracies 'mutatis mutandis.'

Furthermore, in these universities the history of all the other countries and civilizations has been investigated in a pioneering and definitely unmatched way, so that still today an Indian undergraduate learns about Asoka in London rather than in Calcutta, an Iranian researcher studies Cuneiform Achaemenid texts in Berlin rather in Ispahan, an Egyptian student scrutinizes the Inscriptions of Ramses III in Torino rather in Assiut, a Yemeni apprentice focuses on Qatabanic texts in Aix-la-Chapelle rather than in Mukalla, and an Algerian carries out a research on Ibn Hazem in Paris rather in Oran, and so on.

It is wrong to think that politicians, statesmen and administrators matter more than professors and researchers in Europe (and in America). The Western political will – viewed as expressed at a global level – relies on a colossal amount of work in education and culture, and 3-century long research in history, art, philosophy and literature.

Only undeveloped and uncivilized people assume today that engineering and technology are a more important a sector than the humanities. All the modern European and American political establishments are founded on humanities. This knowledge is missing in Africa, Asia (with the exception of Japan, a country that mobilized great resources in Humanities since the 60'ies) and Latin America. And as long as it is missing, these parts of the world will never have the power (because this is all knowledge is about: power) to go ahead, even if at times the political willingness is there (as in the present case of an 'African' Parliament).

Ignorance prevails in Africa

No Union will ever come to Africa, before as many Egyptians learn Amharic as French speak German, before as many Haussa native speakers learn Swahili as Italians speak French and so on. Knowing your next in depth is the beginning; political willingness without that deep knowledge is just rubbish.

In Africa, ignorance reigns everywhere. Can you compare an average Greek's knowledge (obtained in education, through books and mass media, and thanks to trips) of – let's say – France with the level of knowledge an average Tunisian has of Eritrea or Zimbabwe?

What is worse is that a centripetal force does not exist in Africa, as it does in Europe, if we do not want to refer to just relationship between neighbors; can one estimate for how long how many millions of Turks, Greeks, Yugoslavians and Italians have lived in Germany, Belgium and France?

One has reasons to believe that it would be more feasible for Algeria to unite with the European Union than for Morocco to become a partner with Ethiopia, under the auspices of a 'real' African Union, which would function in the same way the European Union does, making of Italy a real partner with Finland….

On the contrary, one finds rather centrifugal forces in the African continent..

The Arab League is the result of a perverse falsification of History

Now, if the situation is like this in Africa, it is even worse when it comes to the so-called 'Arab' League. And it would be wise to expect the situation turn even worse, because in the case of most of these dysfunctional, anachronistic and mostly tyrannical regimes one does not only face a case of missing knowledge (as is the case in Africa) but also meets provocative falsification of the Middle Eastern History and flagrant misinformation and disinformation.

The basic falsehood that is widely diffused among the member states of the 'Arab' League is that there is an Arabic nation, or that the people in all the member states are … Arabs.

There are no Arabs, except in Hedjaz (the west of the Arabian Peninsula)

The only historical truth in this respect is that there are no Arabs at all; there are Arabic-speaking peoples with striking dissimilarities that testify to, and can ensure, only failures in any effort of union among these so different peoples. If this absolute and fundamental historical reality is not widely assessed and understood first, only Islamic Terrorism will emanate from the Arab League's quasi-barbaric realm.

'Arabs': a fabricated bogus-nation that proliferates ignorance, barbarism and terrorism

In reality, the Lebanese are Phoenicians, who got hellenized and aramaized in Late Antiquity.

Arabic speaking Syrians and Iraqis are Aramaeans. So are the Palestinians and the Kuwaitis, as well as the Emirates and the Qataris, who have certainly been intermixed with Persians.

Egyptians are Copts, native Egyptians, descendants of the people of Ancient Egypt in their amalgamations with the numerous foreigners, who passed by the valley of the Nile: Aramaeans, Phoenicians, Yemenis, Greeks, Meroitic Sudanese, Romans, and others.

Sudanese are descendants of the ancient Meroites and the Nubians.

Libyans and the people of the Maghreb are descendants of the Khammitic peoples of the great Atlas, Berbers, in their genuine fusion with Carthaginians and Romans.

And the Yemenites are Yemenites, descendants of the ancient states of Saba, Qataban, Himyar, Hadramout and other; they are closer to Abyssinians (mistakenly called Ethiopians) than to the Arabs of Hedjaz.

Linguistic Arabization due to Islamization does not mean Ethnic, Cultural and Social Arabization

All these peoples, by accepting Islam, sooner or later, started becoming arabized, but this happened at a linguistic, not at a racial, ethnic level. And we know only too well that the Arabs of the times of the Prophet were not numerous at all. One generation later, when let us say Islamic armies were reaching faraway places, such as Carthage in today's Tunisia, Central Asia and the Indus valley, the Muslim fighters were speaking Arabic but among them Arabs were already a minority.

Aramaeans from Damascus and Ctesiphon, Egyptians from Alexandria, Yemenis from Muza, and Persians from Praaspa were already a majority among them! They learnt the language of Quran, but they did not and could not change their racial and ethnic origin.

In addition, one should never forget that, speaking of racial mixtures, at the times of the Prophet all the Arabs were not exceeding in number the population of just one Aramaic, Egyptian or Persian city (namely Tadmor, Alexandria, or Istakhr).

The Copts (Christians) of Egypt and the Aramaeans of Iraq and Iran show very well what happened: those who remained Christians preserved initially their language (Coptic and Aramaic – Syriac) and lost it gradually in later dates. Among the people who accepted Islam in the early period, only Persians preserved their language.

This is not strange, since the great cultural phenomenon of Ferdowsi gives us an insightful understanding of the subject. If Copts and Aranaeans had not been christianized, and if they had kept a national traditional historical record of their glorious past, they would have resulted into a different perception of Islam, preserving their original languages and developing epics similar to Shahnameh.

Because this did not happen, we have the current situation, but this does not mean that these peoples are Arabs, or that a kind of union can be based on falsely perceived history, and a large amount of misinformation and disinformation that was mostly due to colonial powers, mainly France and England, in their efforts against Islam and the Ottoman Empire.

It is from Western Europe that nationalism emanated. And as such, it caused serious problems to peoples of the East and the West, Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and others. The confusion spread throughout the territories of the Ottoman Empire finds its equivalent in the disaster of the Irish, the Scots, the Corsicans and the Celts of Brittany. Actually, it leads to nowhere.

Earlier one understands this, sooner one escapes from the traps that led millions to wars and disaster.

Article Source: http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard

About The Author: Dr. Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis - is Orientalist, Assyriologist, Egyptologist, Iranologist, Islamologist, Historian and Political Scientist. Dr. Megalommatis, 49, is the author of 12 books, dozens of scholarly articles, hundreds of encyclopedia entries, and thousands of articles. He speaks, reads and writes more than 15, modern and ancient, languages.

| View Profile & All Articles By: Muhammad Shamsaddin Megalommatis |

		Post Comment
		Blog This Article!
		Discuss Article in Forum(s)
		Publication \| Reprint Terms

Please Rate this Article

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive The African Union Articles Via RSS!

| Category Feeds | All-in-one Feed | Other Feed & Syndication Options |

Additional Articles From - Home | Afro Issues | The African Union

	Print This Article
	Post Comment
	Add To Favorites
	Email To Friends
	Ezine Ready \| Syndication
	Post To del.icio.us
	Post To Furl
	Add To Google Bookmarks
	Submit To Netscape

	Add To Yahoo! My Web
	Add Main Feed To Outlook
	Post to BookMarks @ AfroArticles.com

	Post To BookMarkAfrica.com

Site Home

Article Categories

More Search Options

Site Map

Submit Articles

Top Authors

Most Recent Articles